EXCLUSIVITY and COSMOPOLITANISM: MULTI-ETHNIC CIVIL SOCIETY in INTERWAR HONG KONG

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While recent work has shown that interwar Asian civic associational culture was becoming more plural than previously understood, scholars focus mostly on transnational networks and neglect local associations co-existing in the colonial urban space. We also know little about how internationalist and liberal ideals interacted with notions of racial and national exclusion prevalent in the wider society. To overcome this, this article examines local organizations alongside transnational networks in interwar Hong Kong to understand fully how global trends in the interwar period affected colonial civic culture. Drawing on Freemasonry, Rotary, the League of Fellowship, and the Kowloon Residents' Association, I discuss the aspirations of multi-racial urbanites in interwar Hong Kong and their limits. I argue that, while internationalism and colonial hierarchies allowed solidarity to be forged amongst multi-racial urbanites and encouraged their civic engagements, racism embedded in the society, rising nationalism, and constitutional constraints put limitations on their aspirations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kong, V. (2020). EXCLUSIVITY and COSMOPOLITANISM: MULTI-ETHNIC CIVIL SOCIETY in INTERWAR HONG KONG. Historical Journal, 63(5), 1281–1302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X20000138

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free