Observing locally self-stabilization in a probabilistic way

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A self-stabilizing algorithm cannot detect by itself that stabilization has been reached. For overcoming this drawback Lin and Simon introduced the notion of an external observer: a set of processes, one being located at each node, whose role is to detect stabilization. Furthermore, Beauquier, Pilard and Rozoy introduced the notion of a local observer: a single observing entity located at an unique node. This entity is not allowed to detect false stabilization, must eventually detect that stabilization is reached, and must not interfere with the observed algorithm. We introduce here the notion of probabilistic observer which realizes the conditions above only with probability 1. We show that computing the size of an anonymous ring with a synchronous self-stabilizing algorithm cannot be observed deterministically. We prove that some synchronous self-stabilizing solution to this problem can be observed probabilistically. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beauquier, J., Pilard, L., & Rozoy, B. (2005). Observing locally self-stabilization in a probabilistic way. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3724 LNCS, pp. 399–413). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11561927_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free