Studies with Low Response Proportions May Be Less Biased than Studies with High Response Proportions

73Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The association between the response proportion in epidemiologic studies and nonresponse bias is complicated, because exposure prevalences and misclassification errors may vary by recruitment wave. In this paper, the authors illustrate the effect of varying degrees of wave-specific nondifferential exposure measurement error in a dichotomous exposure on the relative risk in a hypothetical cohort study of 5,000 participants, by recruitment wave. The field phase of the hypothetical cohort study consisted of five consecutive recruitment waves. The authors assigned response proportions to each wave (wave 1: 30%; wave 2: 10%; wave 3: 10%; wave 4: 30%; wave 5: 20%) and studied three different wave-specific patterns of true exposure prevalence: 1) the true exposure prevalence remains the same in all waves; 2) the true exposure prevalence increases by wave; and 3) the true exposure prevalence decreases by wave. The authors assumed three corresponding patterns of nondifferential misclassification error in exposure status across waves. If the nondifferential exposure misclassification increases by wave, the cumulative relative risk estimate is increasingly biased towards the null. This bias is intensified if the true exposure prevalence increases by wave. Studies with low response proportions may be less biased than studies with high response proportions if the nondifferential misclassification error in a dichotomous exposure increases by recruitment wave.

References Powered by Scopus

Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study

441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?

363Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys

162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Causes and Consequences of Response Rates in Surveys by the News Media and Government Contractor Survey Research Firms

306Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study: Identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response

169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease - Results of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study

149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stang, A., & Jöckel, K. H. (2004). Studies with Low Response Proportions May Be Less Biased than Studies with High Response Proportions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh009

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

28%

Researcher 9

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

72%

Social Sciences 4

13%

Environmental Science 3

9%

Computer Science 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free