Should We Just Let the Machines Do It? The Benefit and Cost of Action Recommendation and Action Implementation Automation

7Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of action recommendation and action implementation automation on performance, workload, situation awareness (SA), detection of automation failure, and return-to-manual performance in a submarine track management task. Background: Theory and meta-analytic evidence suggest that with increasing degrees of automation (DOA), operator performance improves and workload decreases, but SA and return-to-manual performance declines. Method: Participants monitored the location and heading of contacts in order to classify them, mark their closest point of approach (CPA), and dive when necessary. Participants were assigned either no automation, action recommendation automation, or action implementation automation. An automation failure occurred late in the task, whereby the automation provided incorrect classification advice or implemented incorrect classification actions. Results: Compared to no automation, action recommendation automation benefited automated task performance and lowered workload, but cost nonautomated task performance. Action implementation automation resulted in perfect automated task performance (by default) and lowered workload, with no costs to nonautomated task performance, SA, or return-to-manual performance compared to no automation. However, participants provided action implementation automation were less likely to detect the automation failure compared to those provided action recommendations, and made less accurate classifications immediately after the automation failure, compared to those provided no automation. Conclusion: Action implementation automation produced the anticipated benefits but also caused poorer automation failure detection. Application: While action implementation automation may be effective for some task contexts, system designers should be aware that operators may be less likely to detect automation failures and that performance may suffer until such failures are detected.

References Powered by Scopus

A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation

2825Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems

1511Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

1035Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Impact of Automation at Different Cognitive Stages on High-Speed Train Driving Performance

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of two-stage warning system on human performance along with different takeover strategies

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adaptable automation for a more human-centered work design? Effects on human perception and behavior

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tatasciore, M., Bowden, V. K., Visser, T. A. W., & Loft, S. (2022). Should We Just Let the Machines Do It? The Benefit and Cost of Action Recommendation and Action Implementation Automation. Human Factors, 64(7), 1121–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720821989148

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

30%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 4

44%

Engineering 2

22%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

22%

Design 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free