Usefulness of a new serological test (Bio-Rad) to diagnose Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis

29Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A semiquantitative serological test (G.A.P. test; Bio-Rad) to diagnose Helicobacter (Campylobacter) pylori-associated gastritis has recently become commercially available. This test was evaluated with sera from 72 dyspeptic patients with known H. pylori status. When the instructions provided by the manufacturer were applied strictly, the sensitivity of the test was only 32.7%. With a slight modification of the instructions, the performance characteristics were still unsatisfactory (specificity, 43.5%). When a new cutoff value was determined by a receiver operating curve, the quality of the test (positive predictive value, 95.6%; negative predictive value, 77.8%) was slightly lower than that of a noncommercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (positive predictive value, 95.7%; negative predictive value, 84.0%). It is concluded that the Bio-Rad G.A.P. test has low diagnostic yield, and it is stressed that commercial tests should be evaluated extensively before being applied in daily practice.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multi-laboratory comparison of eight commercially available Helicobacter pylori serology kits

137Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of commercially available Helicobacter pylori serology kits: A review

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of three commercial enzyme immunoassays compared with the<sup>13</sup>C urea breath test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Den Oever, H. L. A., Loffeld, R. J. L. F., & Stobberingh, E. E. (1991). Usefulness of a new serological test (Bio-Rad) to diagnose Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 29(2), 283–286. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.2.283-286.1991

Readers over time

‘13‘15‘16‘18‘20‘2100.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

57%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

29%

Neuroscience 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0