Comparison of three adaptive psychophysical procedures

  • Shelton B
  • Picardi M
  • Green D
55Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Auditory thresholds were experimentally determined using three adaptive procedures. The procedures are a simple staircase procedure, a maximum-likelihood technique and PEST. The threshold of a sinusoid in noise (simultaneous task) and the threshold of a sinusoid in a forward masking experiment (successive task) were investigated. Number of trials per block, for the staircase and maximum-likelihood procedures, and stopping rule, for PEST, were varied in four different conditions. Nearly equal numbers of trials were obtained for each procedure. The observed variability in successive determinations of threshold was used to estimate standard errors of measurement. All three procedures produced standard errors of measurement that were nearly equal. Some slight differences among the procedures may be of interest for particular applications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shelton, B. R., Picardi, M. C., & Green, D. M. (1982). Comparison of three adaptive psychophysical procedures. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(6), 1527–1533. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387806

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free