Assessing Deliberative Design of Public Input on British Columbia Biobanks

4Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter critically assesses the public deliberative methodologies used in British Columbia, which involved deliberative events spanning two weekends with 20–25 citizen-deliberators. The development of public and private genetic databases (biobanks) strains dominant understandings of health information privacy, consent to research participation, and responsibilities of the state for public health. This chapter presents an example of incorporating citizens’ views into the regulatory and institutional design of biobanks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burgess, M. M., Longstaff, H., & O’Doherty, K. (2016). Assessing Deliberative Design of Public Input on British Columbia Biobanks. In International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology (Vol. 16, pp. 263–278). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32240-7_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free