Role of 'B-b' knob-hole interactions in fibrin binding to adsorbed fibrinogen

25Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The formation of a fibrin clot is supported by multiple interactions, including those between polymerization knobs 'A' and 'B' exposed by thrombin cleavage and polymerization holes 'a' and 'b' present in fibrinogen and fibrin. Although structural studies have defined the 'A-a' and 'B-b' interactions in part, it has not been possible to measure the affinities of individual knob-hole interactions in the absence of the other interactions occurring in fibrin. Objectives: We designed experiments to determine the affinities of knob-hole interactions, either 'A-a' alone or 'A-a' and 'B-b' together. Methods: We used surface plasmon resonance to measure binding between adsorbed fibrinogen and soluble fibrin fragments containing 'A' knobs, desA-NDSK, or both 'A' and 'B' knobs, desAB-NDSK. Results: The desA- and desAB-NDSK fragments bound to fibrinogen with statistically similar Kd's of 5.8 ± 1.1 μm and 3.7 ± 0.7 μm (P = 0.14), respectively. This binding was specific, as we saw no significant binding of NDSK, which has no exposed knobs. Moreover, the synthetic 'A' knob peptide GPRP and synthetic 'B' knob peptides GHRP and AHRPY, inhibited the binding of desA- and/or desAB-NDSK. Conclusions: The peptide inhibition findings show both 'A-a' and 'B-b' interactions participate in desAB-NDSK binding to fibrinogen, indicating 'B-b' interactions can occur simultaneously with 'A-a'. Furthermore, 'A-a' interactions are much stronger than 'B-b' because the affinity of desA-NDSK was not markedly different from desAB-NDSK. © 2007 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geer, C. B., Tripathy, A., Schoenfisch, M. H., Lord, S. T., & Gorkun, O. V. (2007). Role of “B-b” knob-hole interactions in fibrin binding to adsorbed fibrinogen. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 5(12), 2344–2351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02774.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free