Distribution and habitat selection by muntjac and other species of deer in a coniferous forest

  • Chapman N
  • Claydon K
  • Claydon M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Understanding deer habitat use is important in predictive management of increase deer populations and in assessing the potential for inter-specific competition, particularly between native and introduced species. Habitat usage by roe deer and introduced Chinese muntjac was studied in a 1200ha study area within Thetford Forest, a commercially managed coniferous forest in Eastern England. Habitat use was related to forest growth stage and vegetation composition by pellet-group clearance transects conducted every 2 months from March 2000 to March 2001. Higher densities of roe deer were found in young plantations, while muntjac numbers were lower in open restocks and grassy areas and higher in lder stands and areas with greater cover of bramble Rubus fruticosa agg. Overall, muntjac showed greater habitat selectivity than roe deer. The overlap between the two species in use of individual stands (single, even-age management compartements) was significantly lower than overlap in use of growth stages (consisting of many individual stands), suggesting ecological partitioning at finer spatial scales. However, overlap in habitat use as measured by Pianka's index remained substantial at both scales (mean 0.40 plus or minus 0.16 S.D. for stands and 0.55 plus or minus 0.11 for growth stages). Habitat overlap was greatest in witner when both species aggregate on bramble. There is, therefore, potential for explotaiton competition in the event of food scarcity.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapman, N. G., Claydon, K., Claydon, M., & Harris, S. (1985). Distribution and habitat selection by muntjac and other species of deer in a coniferous forest. Acta Theriologica, 30, 287–303. https://doi.org/10.4098/at.arch.85-20

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

71%

Researcher 4

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

73%

Environmental Science 3

20%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free