Thrombus Extraction Catheters vs. Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in Thrombotic Lesions/SV Grafts

  • Alexopoulos D
  • A. Davlouros P
5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, (pPCI), of native coronaries and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs), is the recommended reperfusion strategy for STEMI, and an early invasive approach is recommended for high risk patients with UA/NSTEMI. Although PCI effectively restores flow in the infarct related artery/culprit vessel in both situations, myocardial perfusion often remains suboptimal due to microvascular obstruction, partly attributed to distal embolization of thrombus. Hence, thrombectomy (manual or mechanical), prior to stenting may further reduce hard clinical end points in patients with ACS. This article discusses accumulated evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of thrombectomy in culprit native coronaries and SVGs in such patients, as well as possible strategies for maximizing its benefits relative to the size of the thrombotic burden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alexopoulos, D., & A. Davlouros, P. (2012). Thrombus Extraction Catheters vs. Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in Thrombotic Lesions/SV Grafts. Current Cardiology Reviews, 8(3), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340312803217265

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free