Accuracy and adoption of wearable technology used by active citizens: A marathon event field study

68Citations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Today, runners use wearable technology such as global positioning system (GPS)-enabled sport watches to track and optimize their training activities, for example, when participating in a road race event. For this purpose, an increasing amount of low-priced, consumer-oriented wearable devices are available. However, the variety of such devices is overwhelming. It is unclear which devices are used by active, healthy citizens and whether they can provide accurate tracking results in a diverse study population. No published literature has yet assessed the dissemination of wearable technology in such a cohort and related influencing factors. Objective: The aim of this study was 2-fold: (1) to determine the adoption of wearable technology by runners, especially "smart"devices and (2) to investigate on the accuracy of tracked distances as recorded by such devices. Methods: A pre-race survey was applied to assess which wearable technology was predominantly used by runners of different age, sex, and fitness level. A post-race survey was conducted to determine the accuracy of the devices that tracked the running course. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate whether age, sex, fitness level, or track distance were influencing factors. Recorded distances of different device categories were tested with a 2-sample t test against each other. Results: A total of 898 pre-race and 262 post-race surveys were completed. Most of the participants (approximately 75%) used wearable technology for training optimization and distance recording. Females (P=.02) and runners in higher age groups (50-59 years: P=.03; 60-69 years: P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pobiruchin, M., Suleder, J., Zowalla, R., & Wiesner, M. (2017). Accuracy and adoption of wearable technology used by active citizens: A marathon event field study. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6395

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free