Maximal Objects and the Semantics of Universal Relation Databases

92Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The universal relation concept is intended to provide the database user with a simplified model in which he can compose queries without regard to the underlying structure of the relations in the database. Frequently, the lossless join criterion provides the query interpreter with the clue needed to interpret the query as the user intended. However, some examples exist where interpretation by the lossless-join rule runs contrary to our intuition. To handle some of these cases, we propose a concept called maximal objects, which modifies the universal relation concept in exactly those situations where it appears to go awry—when the underlying relational structure has “cycles.” We offer examples of how the maximal object concept provides intuitively correct interpretations. We also consider how one might construct maximal objects mechanically from purely syntactic structural information—the relation schemes and functional dependencies—about the database. © 1983, ACM. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning

914Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The design and implementation of INGRES

475Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Testing implications of data dependencies

429Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multi-tenant databases for software as a service: Schema-mapping techniques

230Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the foundations of the universal relation model

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Flex: A Tolerant and Cooperative User Interface to Databases

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maier, D., & Ullman, J. D. (1983). Maximal Objects and the Semantics of Universal Relation Databases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/319830.319831

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 7

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free