Instruction, repetition, discovery: restoring the historical educational role of practice

22Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This conceptual paper considers what it would mean to take seriously Freudenthal's suggestion that mathematics should be taught like swimming. The general claim being made is that “direct instruction” and “discovery” are not opposite but complementary, linked by repetitive yet explorative practice. This claim is elaborated through an empirical case of martial arts instruction. That repetitive practice can nonetheless be a fountainhead of discovery is explained using Bernstein's notion of repetition-without-repetition. Finally, we attend to parallels in canonical mathematics practice. Implications are discussed, with a focus on reconceptualizing direct instruction, repetition, and discovery as complementary and synergistic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trninic, D. (2018). Instruction, repetition, discovery: restoring the historical educational role of practice. Instructional Science, 46(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9443-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free