Conspicuity and Accidents: Data Versus Resource-Limited Differentiations

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Accident events frequently involved failures of conspicuity. These failures can be predominantly sensory in nature in which, either the world itself does not provide sufficient informational cues such that they are masked or diminished in some fashion, or the sensory surfaces of the observing individual prove insufficient to register the critical cues for action. In contrast to sensory conspicuity stands cognitive conspicuity. Here, the cues from the environment may be very clear and also be efficiently registered by the individual perceiver. Yet, their significance may remain unrecognized due to the experiential and/or attentional limitations of that person. Sensory restrictions are often equated to inherent limits in bottom-up processing. In turn, cognitive limitations are linked to restrictions on top-down processing. In this brief paper, I look to explore a further link to the constructs of data-limited and resource-limited capacities which are closely aligned to the conspicuity dimensions identified. Most especially, I look to introduce the co-action of these processes and how their interactive effects play into various forms of accident with examples taken primarily from ground transportation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hancock, P. A. (2019). Conspicuity and Accidents: Data Versus Resource-Limited Differentiations. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 824, pp. 184–192). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free