The effects of climate change information on charitable giving for water quality protection: A field experiment

7Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study uses a field experiment involving 251 adult participants to determine which messages related to climate change, extreme weather events, and decaying infrastructure are most effective in encouraging people to pay more for investments that could alleviate future water-quality risks. The experiment also assesses whether people prefer the investments to be directed toward gray or green infrastructure projects. Messages about global warming induced climate change and decaying infrastructure lead to larger contributions than messages about extreme weather events. The results suggest that people are likely to pay more for green infrastructure projects than for gray infrastructure projects.

References Powered by Scopus

Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments

5530Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hardnose the dictator

506Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition

375Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Experimental and behavioral economics to inform agri-environmental programs and policies

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Real-effort tasks

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Are conservatives more charitable than liberals in the U.S.? A meta-analysis of political ideology and charitable giving

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ellis, S. F., Fooks, J. R., Messer, K. D., & Miller, M. J. (2016). The effects of climate change information on charitable giving for water quality protection: A field experiment. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 45(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2016.17

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

61%

Researcher 6

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 7

39%

Social Sciences 4

22%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

22%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free