Purpose: Treatment outcomes in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved, but optimization and new combinations are needed. We assess three combinations in induction and consolidation. Patients and Methods: Younger untreated patients with AML (median age, 49 years; range, 0 to 73 years) were randomly allocated to two induction courses of daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA) with or without etoposide (ADE; n 1983) or ADE versus fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida; n = 1268), and to amsacrine, cytarabine, etoposide, and then mitoxantrone/ cytarabine (MACE-MidAC) or high-dose cytarabine (n = 1,445) 3 g/m2 or 1.5 g/m2 (n = 657) in consolidation, and finally to a fifth course (cytarabine) or not (n = 227). Results: Overall remission rates were similar for DA versus ADE (84% v 86%; P = .14) and ADE versus FLAG-Ida (86% v 85%; P = .7), with more course 1 remissions after FLAG-Ida (77%) reducing relapse (38% v 55%; P < .001) and improving relapse-free survival (45% v 34%; P
CITATION STYLE
Burnett, A. K., Russell, N. H., Hills, R. K., Hunter, A. E., Kjeldsen, L., Yin, J., … Milligan, D. (2013). Optimization of chemotherapy for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Results of the medical research council AML15 trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(27), 3360–3368. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.47.4874
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.