Experimental validation and characterization of mean swash zone boundary conditions

15Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Performances of recently developed shoreline boundary conditions for wave-averaged nearshore flow solvers are evaluated on the basis of available experimental data. Applications of the model to experimental data show the chosen equations suitably determine boundary values required for one-dimensional mean flow. A detailed illustration is also given of the characteristics of flow properties which appear in the model. It is, finally, shown that very simple conditions can be suitably used at the mean shoreline of wave-averaged flows for which boundary values of position, water depth, and velocity are computed on the basis of local quantities known at the seaward boundary of the swash.

References Powered by Scopus

Nonlinear evolution of shear instabilities of the longshore current: A comparison of observations and computations

133Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A study of radiation stress and set-up in the nearshore region

132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nearshore mixing and dispersion

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Recent advances in modeling swash zone dynamics: Influence of surf-swash interaction on nearshore hydrodynamics and morphodynamics

125Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rhythmic surf zone bars and morphodynamic self-organization

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimal index related to the shoreline dynamics during a storm: The case of Jesolo beach

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bellotti, G., Archetti, R., & Brocchini, M. (2003). Experimental validation and characterization of mean swash zone boundary conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 108(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jc001510

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 6

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 7

64%

Engineering 4

36%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free