Alterações a curto prazo na força de preensão palmar, composição corporal e linfedema induzido pela cirurgia do câncer de mama

23Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigated short-term changes in body composition, handgrip strength, and presence of lymphedema in women who underwent breast cancer surgery. METHODS: Ninety-five women participated in a cross-sectional study, divided into two groups: Control (n=46), with healthy women, and Experimental (n=49), with women six months after breast cancer surgery The Experimental Group was subdivided into right total mastectomy (RTM, n=15), left total mastectomy (LTM, n=11), right quadrant (RQ, n=13), and left quadrant (LQ, n=10). It was also redistributed among women with presence (n=10) or absence (n=39) of lymphedema. Presence of lymphedema, handgrip strength, and body composition were assessed. RESULTS: Trunk lean mass and handgrip strength were decreased in the Experimental Group. Total lean mass was increased in the LTM compared to RTM or LQ. Left handgrip strength in LTM was decreased compared to RTM and RQ and in LQ compared to RTM and RQ. Finally, total lean mass, trunk fat mass, trunk lean mass, right and left arm lean mass were increased in women with lymphedema. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors have changes in their body composition and in handgrip strength six months after surgery; however, the interaction between the type of surgery and its impact is unclear. Furthermore, women who developed lymphedema in this period showed more significant changes in the body composition, but they were not enough to cause impairment in handgrip strength.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gomes, P. R. L., Freitas Junior, I. F., Da Silva, C. B., Gomes, I. C., Rocha, A. P. R., Salgado, A. S. I., & Do Carmo, E. M. (2014). Alterações a curto prazo na força de preensão palmar, composição corporal e linfedema induzido pela cirurgia do câncer de mama. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 36(6), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-720320140005004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free