Beta-lactams in continuous infusion for Gram-negative bacilli osteoarticular infections: an easy method for clinical use

8Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Abstract: Continuous infusion (CI) of beta-lactams could optimize their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices, especially in difficult-to-treat infections. Purpose: To validate an easy-to-use method to guide beta-lactams dosage in CI (formula). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of a prospectively collected cohort (n = 24 patients) with osteoarticular infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) managed with beta-lactams in CI. Beta-lactams dose was calculated using a described formula (daily dose = 24 h × beta-lactam clearance × target “steady-state” concentration) to achieve concentrations above the MIC. We correlated the predicted concentration (Cpred = daily dose/24 h × beta-lactam clearance) with the patient’s observed concentration (Cobs) measured by UPLC–MS/MS (Spearman’s coefficient). Results: The most frequent microorganism treated was P. aeruginosa (21 cases; 9 MDR). Beta-lactams in CI were ceftazidime (n = 14), aztreonam (7), and piperacillin/tazobactam (3), mainly used in combination (12 with colistin, 5 with ciprofloxacin) and administered without notable side effects. The plasma Cobs was higher overall than Cpred; the Spearman correlation between both concentrations was rho = 0.6 (IC 95%: 0.2–0.8) for all beta-lactams, and rho = 0.8 (IC 95%: 0.4–1) for those treated with ceftazidime. Conclusions: The formula may be useful in clinical practice for planning the initial dosage of beta-lactams in CI, while we await a systematic therapeutic drug monitoring. The use of beta-lactams in CI was safe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ribera, A., Soldevila, L., Rigo-Bonnin, R., Tubau, F., Padullés, A., Gómez-Junyent, J., … Murillo, O. (2018). Beta-lactams in continuous infusion for Gram-negative bacilli osteoarticular infections: an easy method for clinical use. Infection, 46(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-018-1116-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free