Gut access in critically ill and injured patients: Where have we gone thus far?

6Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Nutritional support in critically ill and injured patients is crucial. It can be provided via parenteral or enteral access, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we review enteral support, particularly gut access. Methods: We conducted a literature review. Results: A number of techniques enable access to the gastrointestinal tract in critically ill and injured patients. A temporary orogastric (OG), nasogastric (NG), or nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube can be placed. But the prevalent technique is the more permanent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which has economic as well as safety benefits. Other techniques include open operative gastrostomy, laparoscopic or laparoscopic-as-sisted gastrostomy, and jejunostomy. Conclusions: Nutritional support should be provided enterally, via gut access whenever possible. The issue of pre- versus post-pyloric access remains controversial. PEG is safe and economical for long-term access. © Springer-Verlag 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kulvatunyou, N., Joseph, B., Tang, A., O’Keeffe, T., Wynne, J. L., Friese, R. S., … Rhee, P. (2011). Gut access in critically ill and injured patients: Where have we gone thus far? European Surgery - Acta Chirurgica Austriaca, 43(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-011-0590-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free