Gravitational valves: Relevant differences with different technical solutions to counteract hydrostatic pressure

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two different technical principles of gravitational valves (G-valves) have been presented: counterbalancer and switcher G-valves. The objective of our prospective study was to look for clinically relevant differences between both. A total of 54 patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) were treated; 30 patients received an Aesculap-Miethke GA-Valve (GAV; counterbalancer), and in 24 patients an Aesculap-Miethke Dualswitch-Valve (DSV; switcher) was implanted. The opening pressure of the posture-independent valve was 5 cm H2O in both devices. The outcome was clearly better with the usage of the GAV than with the DSV. The frequency and severity of complications was pronounced in the DSV group. We recommend the Aesculap-Miethke-GAV valve with a low opening pressure in a posture-independent valve for patients with NPH. © 2006 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kiefer, M., Meier, U., & Eymann, R. (2006). Gravitational valves: Relevant differences with different technical solutions to counteract hydrostatic pressure. Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum, (96), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-30714-1_71

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free