Towards synthetic gene circuits with enhancers: Biology’s multi-input integrators

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges facing synthetic biology is to develop a technology that allows gene regulatory circuits in microbes to integrate multiple inputs or stimuli using a small DNA sequence “foot-print”, and which will generate precise and reproducible outcomes. Achieving this goal is hindered by the routine utilization of the commonplace σ 70 promoters in gene-regulatory circuits. These promoters typically are not capable of integrating binding of more than two or three transcription factors in natural examples, which has limited the field to developing integrated circuits made of two-input biological “logic” gates. In natural examples the regulatory elements, which integrate multiple inputs are called enhancers. These regulatory elements are ubiquitous in all organisms in the tree of life, and interestingly metazoan and bacterial enhancers are signi ficantly more similar in terms of both Transcription Factor binding site arrangement and biological function than previously thought. These similarities imply that there may be underlying enhancer design principles or grammar rules by which one can engineer novel gene regulatory circuits. However, at present our current understanding of enhancer structurefunction relationship in all organisms is limited, thus preventing us from using these objects routinely in synthetic biology application. In order to alleviate this problem, in this book chapter, I will review our current view of bacterial enhancers, allowing us to first highlight the potential of enhancers to be a game-changing tool in synthetic biology application, and subsequently to draw a road-map for developing the necessary quantitative understanding to reach this goal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amit, R. (2012). Towards synthetic gene circuits with enhancers: Biology’s multi-input integrators. Subcellular Biochemistry, 64, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5055-5_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free