Receptive vocabulary measures for EFL Costa Rican high school students

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study offers a glimpse of the current situation of foreign language education in the Costa Rican context from the perspective of vocabulary knowledge, particularly passive vocabulary size. Students from two institutions participated: one school implements Content Based Teaching while the other follows traditional, Foreign Language Teaching instruction. This research aims to describe the receptive vocabulary profile of students and to compare the vocabulary levels of students between two gender groups and under two types of English language teaching. These measures are established following the idea originally presented in Paul Nation's (1983, 1990) Vocabulary Levels Test. In this case, Schmitt, Schmitt and Clapham's (2001) Version 2 test was used to define passive vocabulary levels. Finally, the results of this analysis are compared to results for similar population samples in other studies.

References Powered by Scopus

How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?

1061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning

792Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test

738Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Content and language integrated learning in Latin America 2008-2018: Ten years of research and practice

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

L2 PROFICIENCY AND DEVELOPMENT IN CLIL

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An analysis on the vocabulary of learners of turkish as a foreign language

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castro-García, D. (2017). Receptive vocabulary measures for EFL Costa Rican high school students. International Journal of English Studies, 17(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2017/2/265681

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

43%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

29%

Researcher 3

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

40%

Linguistics 5

33%

Arts and Humanities 3

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free