The influence of feedback and diagnostic data on pseudodiagnosticity

16Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pseudodiagnosticity is the tendency of people to select diagnostically worthless data in an opinion revision task and then to make a judgment based on those data. University students were presented four problems in which they selected data and then made a judgment based on those data. Knowledge of results was provided on each trial. Half the subjects were “force-fed” truly diagnostic data. Getting the correct answer virtually guaranteed that subjects repeated the data selection strategy that preceded it. Data selection following an incorrect answer was contingent upon whether the subjects had seen diagnostically relevant data. © 1981, The psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases

22493Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information

15106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pseudodiagnosticity

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?

2750Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant?

241Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Finding useful questions: On bayesian diagnosticity, probability, impact, and information gain

194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doherty, M. E., Schiavo, M. B., Tweney, R. D., & Mynatt, C. R. (1981). The influence of feedback and diagnostic data on pseudodiagnosticity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18(4), 191–194. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333600

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 5

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

20%

Social Sciences 2

20%

Decision Sciences 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free