Persistence and integration: Two consequences of a sliding integrator

39Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The detection of a silent interval, or gap, placed in the temporal center of a gated noise burst was investigated. The gated noise masker ranged from 2 to 400 msec in duration. For long noises, the duration, Δ, of the just-detectable gap remained fixed at about 2.8 msec. Progressively shortening the duration of the noise did not affect Δ until the duration was approximately 20 msec; thereafter, decreasing the noise duration improved detectability of the gap. In a second experiment, continuous noise filled the temporal gap, although the decibel difference between the noise in the gap and the noise surrounding the gap was always at least 5 dB. The level of noise filling the gap did not greatly affect Δ. The third experiment was similar to the first, except that the signal was a click rather than a gap. The results for both gaps and clicks were fitted by a model assuming a sliding integrator. © 1975 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Penner, M. J. (1975). Persistence and integration: Two consequences of a sliding integrator. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free