OMP or BP? A comparison study of image fusion based on joint sparse representation

7Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In image fusion techniques based on joint sparse representation (JSR), the composite image is calculated from the fusion of features, which are represented with sparse coefficients. Orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) and basis pursuit (BP) are the main candidates to estimate the coefficients. Previously OMP is utilized for the advantage of low complexity. However, noticeable errors occur when the dictionary of JSR cannot ensure the coefficients are sparse enough. Alternatively, BP is more robust than OMP in such cases (though suffered from larger complexity). Unfortunately, it has never been studied in image fusion tasks. In this paper, we investigate JSR based on BP for image fusion. The target is to verify that 1) to what extent can BP outperform OMP; and 2) what is the trade-off between BP and OMP. Finally, we conclude, in some cases, fusion with BP obviously outperforms the one with OMP under an affordable computational complexity. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yao, Y., Xin, X., & Guo, P. (2012). OMP or BP? A comparison study of image fusion based on joint sparse representation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7667 LNCS, pp. 75–82). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34500-5_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free