Can Latent Alignments Improve Autoregressive Machine Translation?

6Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Latent alignment objectives such as CTC and AXE significantly improve non-autoregressive machine translation models. Can they improve autoregressive models as well? We explore the possibility of training autoregressive machine translation models with latent alignment objectives, and observe that, in practice, this approach results in degenerate models. We provide a theoretical explanation for these empirical results, and prove that latent alignment objectives are incompatible with teacher forcing.

References Powered by Scopus

Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units

4457Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Connectionist temporal classification: Labelling unsegmented sequence data with recurrent neural networks

3570Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

End-to-end non-autoregressive neural machine translation with connectionist temporal classification

118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

O2NA: An Object-Oriented Non-Autoregressive Approach for Controllable Video Captioning

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hierarchical Latent Alignment for Non-Autoregressive Generation under High Compression Ratio

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haviv, A., Vassertail, L., & Levy, O. (2021). Can Latent Alignments Improve Autoregressive Machine Translation? In NAACL-HLT 2021 - 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 2637–2641). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.209

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

65%

Researcher 5

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 19

73%

Linguistics 4

15%

Engineering 2

8%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free