Regulation of PLK1 through competition between hnRNPK, miR-149-3p and miR-193b-5p

33Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is a critical regulator of cell cycle progression and apoptosis. However, its regulation remains poorly understood. In the present study, we investigated the molecular mechanism underlying the post-transcriptional regulation of PLK1. We observed that heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNPK) and PLK1 were positively associated in several different cancers and high expression levels of them correlated with poor prognosis in patients with cancer. Knockdown of hnRNPK resulted in reduced expression of PLK1, whereas conversely, PLK1 expression was increased in hnRNPK-overexpressing cells. We found that hnRNPK regulated PLK1 expression through KH1- and KH2-dependent interactions with the 3′UTR of PLK1 mRNA. In addition, microRNA-149-3p (miR-149-3p) and miR-193b-5p suppressed PLK1 expression by targeting the 3′UTR of PLK1 mRNA. MicroRNA-elicited enrichment of PLK1 mRNA in Ago2 immunoprecipitation was altered by the presence or absence of hnRNPK. Furthermore, the deletion of the cytosine (C)-rich sequences of the 3′UTR of PLK1 mRNA abolished the decreased PLK1 expression observed via hnRNPK silencing and administration of miRNAs, a finding that suggests that hnRNPK shares this C-rich motif with miR-149-3p and miR-193b-5p. We also found that downregulation of PLK1 by either silencing hnRNPK or overexpression of miR-149-3p and miR-193b-5p decreased clonogenicity and induced apoptosis. Our findings from this study demonstrate that hnRNPK regulates PLK1 expression by competing with the PLK1-targeting miRNAs, miR-149-3p and miR-193b-5p.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shin, C. H., Lee, H., Kim, H. R., Choi, K. H., Joung, J. G., & Kim, H. H. (2017). Regulation of PLK1 through competition between hnRNPK, miR-149-3p and miR-193b-5p. Cell Death and Differentiation, 24(11), 1861–1871. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2017.106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free