Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: Evaluation of the impact of a perioperative clinical pathway, a pilot study

16Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background & objective: Major abdominal surgery morbidity can reach 50%. Prehabilitation has shown promising results in decreasing complications. However, it is unknown if prehabilitation can have a positive effect specifically after major abdominal surgery. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a prehabilitation program before major abdominal surgery. Methods: All patients evaluated for major abdominal surgery between February and April 2018 were eligible. A 4-week trimodal prehabilitation program combining physical therapy, nutritional support and psychological preparation was set up. Results: Among 106 patients evaluated for major abdominal surgery during the study period, 60 were included in the prehabilitation program. No cardiovascular events occurred during prehabilitation. The 6-min walking distance increased significantly (+45 m, increase of 9.3%, p = 0.008) after prehabilitation (and before the operation). Anxiety, depression, and several quality of life (QoL) items improved. Postoperative 90-day mortality and morbidity were 3.4% and 48%, respectively. Median hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay were 14 and 6 days, respectively. For 19 patients readmitted, the treatment was medical, radiological, or surgical, for 11, 5, and 3 patients, respectively. Conclusions: Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery is feasible, safe, and improve patients’ functional reserves, QoL, and psychological status.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boukili, I. E., Flaris, A. N., Mercier, F., Cotte, E., Kepenekian, V., Vaudoyer, D., … Passot, G. (2022). Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: Evaluation of the impact of a perioperative clinical pathway, a pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 111(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969221083394

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free