How is human resource management research (not) helping practice? In defence of practical implications

16Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article provokes that human resource management (HRM) research is a long way from helping practice. Following a review of HRM empirical articles published in 2018, we show the limited focus academic journals place on practical implications. We provoke that HRM journals are failing to ‘do the right thing’ by not requiring authors to pay enough attention to communicating the practical implications of their research. In half of the articles that we reviewed (n = 324) less than 2% of the text focuses on practical implications. We also found that where practical implications were offered, they were often obscure, implicit, and used unintelligible terms. We argue for extensive practical implications to be included in publications that provide an impetus to research relevant topics and close the knowledge-translation gap.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kougiannou, N. K., & Ridgway, M. (2022, April 1). How is human resource management research (not) helping practice? In defence of practical implications. Human Resource Management Journal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12414

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free