The effects of high- versus moderate-intensity exercise on fatigue in sarcoidosis

8Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Fatigue is a common symptom in patients with sarcoidosis. Despite lacking evidence on whether high-intensity interval training (HIIT) will aggravate fatigue, moderate-intensity exercise is often recommended. This study aimed to investigate whether a single session of HIIT would affect fatigue differently from a single session of moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). Methods: Forty-one patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis were recruited to a cross-over study. All patients completed one treadmill session of HIIT (85% of peak heart rate (HRpeak)) and one of MICT (70% of HRpeak). Fatigue was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale 0–100 mm, before (T0), after (T1), and 24 hours after (T2) each exercise session. Paired sample t-test was used to compare changes in fatigue from T0 to T1 and from T0 to T2 between HIIT and MICT. Results: No statistically significant difference in fatigue levels was found between HIIT and MICT, either at T1 (3.6 (13.5) and 1.4 (13.5)) or at T2 (8.2 (17.0) and 2.1 (17.1)). Conclusions: A single session of HIIT did not affect fatigue differently than a single session of MICT. These preliminary findings support the need for further research on the long-term effect of HIIT on fatigue in patients with sarcoidosis.

References Powered by Scopus

Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion

12796Citations
1545Readers
Get full text

ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test

9481Citations
4087Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grongstad, A., Vøllestad, N. K., Oldervoll, L. M., Spruit, M. A., & Edvardsen, A. (2019). The effects of high- versus moderate-intensity exercise on fatigue in sarcoidosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040460

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Researcher 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 10

53%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

16%

Social Sciences 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free