Effect modification, interaction and mediation: An overview of theoretical insights for clinical investigators

150Citations
Citations of this article
461Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We revisited the three interrelated epidemiological concepts of effect modification, interaction and mediation for clinical investigators and examined their applicability when using research databases. The standard methods that are available to assess interaction, effect modification and mediation are explained and exemplified. For each concept, we first give a simple “best-case” example from a randomized controlled trial, followed by a structurally similar example from an observational study using research databases. Our explanation of the examples is based on recent theoretical developments and insights in the context of large health care databases. Terminology is sometimes ambiguous for what constitutes effect modification and interaction. The strong assumptions underlying the assessment of interaction, and particularly mediation, require clinicians and epidemiologists to take extra care when conducting observational studies in the context of health care databases. These strong assumptions may limit the applicability of interaction and mediation assessments, at least until the biases and limitations of these assessments when using large research databases are clarified.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corraini, P., Olsen, M., Pedersen, L., Dekkers, O. M., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2017). Effect modification, interaction and mediation: An overview of theoretical insights for clinical investigators. Clinical Epidemiology, 9, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S129728

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free