Many organizations using Free/Open Source Software (FlOSS) are dealing with the major problem of selecting the most appropriate software product corresponding to their needs. Most of theses companies are currently selecting FlOSS projects using ad-hoc techniques. However, in the last couple of years, two methodologies for assessing FlOSS project have emerge, namely QSOS and OpenBRR. The objective of this work is, through a detailed and rigorous assessment methodology comparison, to allow companies to have a better understanding of these two assessment methodologies content and limitation. This work compares both methodologies on several aspects, among others, their overall approaches, their scoring procedures and their evaluation criteria. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
CITATION STYLE
Deprez, J. C., & Alexandre, S. (2008). Comparing Assessment Methodologies for Free/Open Source Software: OpenBRR and QSOS. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5089 LNCS, pp. 189–203). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_17
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.