Quadrupole mass filters with added hexapole fields

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Conventional mass analysis has been investigated experimentally with six quadrupole mass filters with added hexapole fields; three with added hexapole fields of 4%, 8% and 12% with equal diameter rods, and three with added hexapole fields of 4%, 8% and 12% with unequal diameter rods to remove an added octopole field. Compared with conventional quadrupoles, these rod sets have very large field distortions. With the positive resolving dc applied to the y rods (Mathieu parameter ax < 0) only low resolution (10-100) and low transmission are seen. With the polarity reversed (ax > 0) much higher resolution (≥1000) and transmission are possible. Increasing the magnitude of the added hexapole field decreases the limiting resolution at m/z 609. Removing the added octopole field increases the limiting resolution. In some cases structure is formed on the peaks. For a given scan line slope, U/Vrf, the resolution decreases as the amplitude of the added hexapole field increases. These results are consistent with changes to the stability diagrams, calculated here. With ax > 0, adding a hexapole field causes the x stability boundary to move outward with all rod sets. With ax < 0, the boundaries become diffuse and the tip of the stability diagram becomes rounded, limiting the resolution to ca. 10-100. Where comparisons are possible, experiments show the rod sets with added hexapole fields have transmission 10-300 times less than a conventional quadrupole. Thus these quadrupoles are less useful for mass analysis than conventional quadrupoles. However, it is surprising, given the highly distorted fields, that some of the quadrupoles give resolution of 1000 or more. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xiao, Z., Zhao, X., & Douglas, D. J. (2010). Quadrupole mass filters with added hexapole fields. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 24(14), 1985–1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4596

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free