Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: The impacts of regulation and report cards

64Citations
Citations of this article
139Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The high cost of the US health care system does not buy uniformly high quality of care. Concern about low quality has prompted two major types of public policy responses: regulation, a top-down approach, and report cards, a bottom-up approach. Each can result in either functional provider responses, which increase quality, or dysfunctional responses, which may lower quality. What do we know about the impacts of these two policy approaches to quality? To answer this question, we review the extant literature on regulation and report cards. We find evidence of both functional and dysfunctional effects. In addition, we identify the areas in which additional research would most likely be valuable. ©2014 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mukamel, D. B., Haeder, S. F., & Weimer, D. L. (2014). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: The impacts of regulation and report cards. In Annual Review of Public Health (Vol. 35, pp. 477–497). Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082313-115826

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free