Invasive species management programs in Alaska: A survey of statewide expenditures, 2007 - 11

4Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Invasive species have already reduced biodiversity, damaged the environment, threatened human health, and created economic losses worldwide. Alaska, by contrast, had relatively few invasive species for most of the 20th century. But increased population and development in recent years have brought an influx of non-native species. However, the problem remains in its infancy, and Alaska still has the opportunity to take advantage of cost-effective management, given appropriate coordination among government agencies and private groups. To help improve such coordination and increase public understanding about this issue, the authors collected data on spending to manage invasive species in Alaska between 2007 and 2011. Such spending increased from $4.7 million in 2007 to $6.9 million in 2010, and it totaled $29 million over the entire study period. Federal agencies paid 84% of that total, non-profits paid 9%, the State of Alaska paid 5%, local governments paid 2%, and private donors paid less than 1%. Most spending (79%) targeted invasive terrestrial plants and animals, but spending for invasive marine and freshwater organisms increased over the period. The largest individual expenses were for eradicating Norway rats that were killing bird populations on an Aleutian island ($5 million), northern pike that were eating juvenile salmon in lakes of Southcentral Alaska ($2.7 million), and European rabbits that were destroying bird habitat in southwestern Alaska ($0.8 million). Overall, research accounted for 24%, monitoring for 20%, eradication for 20%, administration and planning for 11%, and other spending for 25% of total expenditures. The number of jobs in managing invasive species increased over the study period, as did volunteer efforts, which may suggest increasing public awareness about this issue in Alaska. © The Arctic Institute of North America.

References Powered by Scopus

Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States

3678Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biological invasion risks and the public good: An economic perspective

331Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Aquatic invasive species change ecosystem services from the world's largest wild sockeye salmon fisheries in Alaska

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hitchhikers on floats to Arctic freshwater: Private aviation and recreation loss from aquatic invasion

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Breeding status and nest characteristics of rose-ringed (Psittacula Krameri) and alexandrine parakeets (Psittacula Eupatria) in Istanbul’s city parks

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwörer, T., Federer, R. N., & Ferren, H. J. (2014). Invasive species management programs in Alaska: A survey of statewide expenditures, 2007 - 11. Arctic, 67(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4359

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

59%

Researcher 9

41%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

43%

Environmental Science 8

38%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

10%

Social Sciences 2

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0