This article examines a popular complaint against the fictionalist account of possible objects bruited by Gideon Rosen. This is the complaint that modal fictionalism is, in some sense or other, hopelessly artificial. I shall separate two different strands to this worry and examine each in turn. As we shall see, neither strand to the objection is intractable. © 2011 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
CITATION STYLE
Woodward, R. (2011). Is modal fictionalism artificial? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 92(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01411.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.