Is modal fictionalism artificial?

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines a popular complaint against the fictionalist account of possible objects bruited by Gideon Rosen. This is the complaint that modal fictionalism is, in some sense or other, hopelessly artificial. I shall separate two different strands to this worry and examine each in turn. As we shall see, neither strand to the objection is intractable. © 2011 University of Southern California and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woodward, R. (2011). Is modal fictionalism artificial? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 92(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01411.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free