Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Residual Renal Function in Chronic Haemodialysis Patients Treated with High-Flux Synthetic Dialysis Membranes: A Pilot Study

  • Feldman L
  • Abu Hamad R
  • Efrati S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background . Preservation of residual renal function in chronic dialysis patients has proven to be a major predictor of survival. The aim of the present study was to investigate an ability of the combined use of N-acetylcysteine and high-flux biocompatible haemodialysis membranes to improve residual renal function in haemodialysis patients. Patients and Methods . Chronic haemodialysis patients with a residual urine output of at least 100 mL/24 h were administered oral an N-acetylcysteine 1200 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Treatment group included patients treated with dialysers using high-flux synthetic biocompatible membranes. Control group included patients treated with dialysers using low-flux semisyntetic triacetate haemodialysis membranes. Results . Eighteen patients participated in the study. The residual glomerular filtration rate showed a nonsignificant trend for increase in both groups. The magnitude of GFR improvement after N-acetylcysteine administration was less pronounced in the group treated with high-flux biocompatible membranes: +0.17 ± 0.56 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in treatment group and +0.65 ± 0.53 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in control group ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion . In this study of favorable effect of N-acetylcysteine on residual renal function in chronic haemodialysis patients may be less pronounced when using high-flux biocompatible, rather than low-flux semisyntetic, HD membranes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feldman, L., Abu Hamad, R., Efrati, S., Ashker, A., Beberashvili, I., & Shani, M. (2013). Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Residual Renal Function in Chronic Haemodialysis Patients Treated with High-Flux Synthetic Dialysis Membranes: A Pilot Study. ISRN Nephrology, 2013, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/636208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free