Evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of environmental impact assessment in the federal republic of Germany

46Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study uses empirical research of 145 projects on environmental impact assessment (EIA). The researchers generated and tested hypotheses based on questions about the effectiveness and quality of EIA. By means of EIA, aspects of proactive thinking have entered into procedural decisions more than previously presumed and modifications in the spatial dimensions of projects have played an especially prominent role. The three most important factors affecting the scale of general project modifications are: the degree to which the subject matter and methodological aspects of a study are prescribed by §5 of the EIA Act (Scoping); the early, intense involvement of authorities, experts, and third parties in the scoping; and the degree to which the project's effects and impacts are analyzed and forecast in the environmental impact study (EIS). EIA and EIS practice has moved beyond the ‘experimental phase’ and routines have now emerged for certain parts of the procedure. © 2002 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wende, W. (2002). Evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of environmental impact assessment in the federal republic of Germany. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20(2), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154602781766735

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free