Large-scale clonal analysis reveals unexpected complexity in surface ectoderm morphogenesis

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Understanding the series of morphogenetic processes that underlie the making of embryo structures is a highly topical issue in developmental biology, essential for interpreting the massive molecular data currently available. In mouse embryo, long-term in vivo analysis of cell behaviours and movements is difficult because of the development in utero and the impossibility of long-term culture. Methodology/Principal Findings: We improved and combined two genetic methods of clonal analysis that together make practicable large-scale production of labelled clones. Using these methods we performed a clonal analysis of surface ectoderm (SE), a poorly understood structure, for a period that includes gastrulation and the establishment of the body plan. We show that SE formation starts with the definition at early gastrulation of a pool of founder cells that is already dorso-ventrally organized. This pool is then regionalized antero-posteriorly into three pools giving rise to head, trunk and tail. Each pool uses its own combination of cell rearrangements and mode of proliferation for elongation, despite a common clonal strategy that consists in disposing along the antero-posterior axis precursors of dorso-ventrally-oriented stripes of cells. Conclusions/Significance: We propose that these series of morphogenetic processes are organized temporally and spatially in a posterior zone of the embryo crucial for elongation. The variety of cell behaviours used by SE precursor cells indicates that these precursors are not equivalent, regardless of a common clonal origin and a common clonal strategy. Another major result is the finding that there are founder cells that contribute only to the head and tail. This surprising observation together with others can be integrated with ideas about the origin of axial tissues in bilaterians. © 2009 Petit et al.

Figures

  • Table 1. The LaacZ library: frequency of embryos with N events of recombination.
  • Table 2. The LaacZ library: size composition of the clones.
  • Table 3. The lox-LacZ library of clones induced at E6.5 and observed at E14.5.
  • Figure 1. SE labelling induced from E6.5 to E13.5 reveals a single clonal strategy for all regions of the embryo. (A–C) [ROSAcreERT6R26R] and (D–F) [CT26R26R] embryos. Pregnant mice injected with 4-OHT at E13.5 (A), E12.5 (B), E9.5 (C), E8.5 (D), E7.5 (E), E6.5 (F). Observation of E14.5 embryos. Growth is isotropic (A); dorso-ventrally oriented and coherent in (B) to (D). In (E) and (F), growth is dispersive and results in longitudinally dorso-ventrally oriented stripes. (G), (I), (K–Q) Examples of clones observed in LaacZ embryos; (H), (J) Examples of clones observed in lox-LacZ embryos induced at E6.5. (G)–(J) in head regions, (K) to (P) in the trunk and (Q) in the tail. Arrowheads indicate the most dorsal position to which the clones contribute. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004353.g001
  • Figure 2. Ancestral and founder cells of the surface ectoderm. Examples of clones dispersed along the entire SE observed in E14.5 LaacZ embryos. (A)–(J9) non-SE-restricted clones classified from biggest to smallest. (K–K9) the biggest SE-restricted clone. (L–L9) the biggest non SErestricted clone. (M–M999) Superimposition of (B–B999), (D–D999), (F–F999), (H–H999), and (J–J999); note the lack of labelling in the most dorsal region of SE delimited by the lines. (A), (C), (E), (G), (I) in toto X-gal staining. (B), (D), (F), (H), (J) drawings of their SE contribution. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004353.g002
  • Figure 3. Three pools of SE-forming cells at E6-5-E7.5, following distinct modes of growth in the head and the trunk. (A) Schematic representation of the pattern of the 64 clones in E14.5 lox-LacZ embryos induced at E6.5–E7.5. Horizontal lines represent the boundaries between the regions of the body in A. Each vertical orange line corresponds to a single clone; no contribution to the levels where the line is interrupted. Dark red lines represent the contribution of the clone to the contralateral side. Clones were first classified according to size (long on left and short on right) and then according to the most anterior region to which they contribute. (B) Schematic representation of an E14.5 embryo showing the regions used in A. (C)–(M) Examples of E14.5 lox-LacZ embryos. (C)–(G) and (M) long clones; (H) and (I) posterior short clones; (J)–(L) anterior short clones. (N) is a spontaneous clone (in a CT2 embryo) labelled only in the head and the tail. (O) Schematic representation, as in fig. 4, of the pattern of the clones in E14.5 LaacZembryos. All clones were classified according to size (long on left and short on right) and then according to the most anterior region to which they contribute. (P), (P9) Pattern of clones expected from the labelling of cells in the pool of precursors classified according to the most
  • Figure 4. Cell arrangement of the clonally related P-DVCUs in the trunk. (A)–(G): Examples of clonal organisation in the trunk. The most dorsal positions of the DV-oriented stripes have been connected by one (A)–(D), two (E) or several (F), (G) lines, defining five discrete DV positions: dorsal (D), dorso-lateral (A), latero-medial (A, magenta line), mid-ventral (B), and ventral (C), schematically represented by yellow lines in (H and H9). A– A9, B and E–E9, from the LaacZ library; C, D, from the E6.5 lox- LacZ library; F, G: spontaneous labelling. A–A9 and E–E9 are two different views of the same embryo. d: dorsal, dl: dorsal-lateral, lm: lateral-medial, mv: mid-ventral, v: ventral. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004353.g004
  • Figure 5. Cell arrangement of the clonally related P-DVCUs in the head. (A)–(G): Examples of clonal organisation in the head. The most dorsal positions of the DV-oriented stripes have been connected by one (A)–(C), two (D), (E) or three (F)–(G99) lines, defining four discrete DV positions: dorsal (A), dorso-lateral (B),(E), latero-medial (C) and mid-ventral (D), (F), (G). Points indicate the most dorsal position of the DVCU. The red lines connect DVCUS in the head, the magenta lines connect DVCUS in the trunk. (H), (I): Ventral labelling in the head. These labellings are connected with more dorsal head regions (arrowheads) but not with the ventral trunk region. (A), (F), (G) from the E6.5 lox-LacZ library; (B)–(E), (H)–(I): from the LaacZ library (F, F9, F99; G, G9, G99 and E, E9, E99 different views of the same embryo). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004353.g005

References Powered by Scopus

Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain [1]

4285Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficient recombination in diverse tissues by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre: A tool for temporally regulated gene activation/inactivation in the mouse

1083Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of a recombinant retrovirus to study post-implantation cell lineage in mouse embryos.

1056Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Numb is required to prevent p53-dependent senescence following skeletal muscle injury

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clonal and molecular analysis of the prospective anterior neural boundary in the mouse embryo

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Redefining the structure of the hair follicle by 3D clonal analysis

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petit, A. C., & Nicolas, J. F. (2009). Large-scale clonal analysis reveals unexpected complexity in surface ectoderm morphogenesis. PLoS ONE, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004353

Readers over time

‘09‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘2000.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

40%

Researcher 5

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

60%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

7%

Computer Science 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0