Gerrymandering politics out of the redistricting process: Toward a planning revolution in redrawing local legislative boundaries

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Jurisdictions in the United States are granted considerable discretion in choosing the method by which they redraw their political boundaries following a decennial census. Two common methods are allowing legislatures to redistrict or creating a citizen commission to perform the task. Yet each of these processes frequently results in gridlock and/or political gerrymandering. This paper proposes an alternative method for local jurisdictions: a "planning approach" to redistricting in which it is suggested that districts can be created through the amalgamation of neighborhoods in a process driven by professional planners. This approach lends no consideration to politics. Rather, the research presented here posits that empowering planners to lead legislative redistricting processes will aid in the reduction of politically anticompetitive behavior, thereby increasing the efficiency, effectiveness, and logic of the process. A local redistricting problem using data from Buffalo, NY, is modeled and then solved using the proposed planning framework.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weaver, R. C. (2012). Gerrymandering politics out of the redistricting process: Toward a planning revolution in redrawing local legislative boundaries. Berkeley Planning Journal, 25(1), 98–123. https://doi.org/10.5070/bp325111795

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free