The fact that various definitions and terminology applied to measurements in analytical chemistry are not always consistent and straightforward, by not only answering the question what, but also how, leads to their various interpretations. This results in non-uniform implementation of very basic and essential metrological principles in chemistry. Such a diverse situation is not conducive to the endorsement of harmonised measurements all across the world, to serve as a tool for improving the quality of life in its broadest sense for all its citizens. The discussion in this paper is focused on problems associated with terminology and definitions of 'reference material' and 'validation'. The role of reference materials in measurement processes for purposes other than calibration and validation principles in analytical chemistry are also discussed in this paper. Where possible, potential solutions are proposed, but more often, questions of essential importance are raised in order to initiate international discussion which will hopefully lead to equally understandable answers. © 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
CITATION STYLE
Majcen, N. (2005). A need for clearer terminology and guidance in the role of reference materials in method development and validation. In Validation in Chemical Measurement (pp. 116–120). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27034-5_21
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.