MRI with zero echo time: Hard versus sweep pulse excitation

162Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Zero echo time can be obtained in MRI by performing radiofrequency (RF) excitation as well as acquisition in the presence of a constant gradient applied for purely frequency-encoded, radial centre-out k-space encoding. In this approach, the spatially nonselective excitation must uniformly cover the full frequency bandwidth spanned by the readout gradient. This can be accomplished either by short, hard RF pulses or by pulses with a frequency sweep as used in the SWIFT (Sweep imaging with Fourier transform) method for improved performance at limited RF amplitudes. In this work, the two options are compared with respect to T2 sensitivity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and SNR efficiency. In particular, the SNR implications of sweep excitation and of initial or periodical acquisition gaps required for transmit-receive switching are investigated. It was found by simulations and experiments that, whereas equivalent in terms of T2 sensitivity, the two techniques differ in SNR performance. With ideal, ungapped simultaneous excitation and acquisition, the sweep approach would yield higher SNR throughout due to larger feasible flip angles. However, acquisition gapping is found to take a significant SNR toll related to a reduced acquisition duty cycle, rendering hard pulse excitation superior for sufficient RF amplitude and also in the short-T2 limit. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weiger, M., Pruessmann, K. P., & Hennel, F. (2011). MRI with zero echo time: Hard versus sweep pulse excitation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 66(2), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22799

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free