Size-arrival effects: The potential roles of conflicts between monocular and binocular time-to-contact information, and of computer aliasing

14Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

With computer simulations of self-motion, participants approached a floating object and tried to "jump" over it without collision. Participants "jumped" significantly later over small objects than they did over larger objects. This occurred when the displays were viewed monocularly or binocularly, a finding that suggests that such size-arrival effects (DeLucia & Warren, 1994) were not due to a conflict between monocular and binocular cues to time-to-contact (TTC) information (Tresilian, 1994, 1995). Moreover, the results further suggest that size-arrival effects are not due to irregularities in TTC information that can occur from computer aliasing and that the latter does not always affect TTC estimation; visual information used in such judgments does not seem to be extracted on a frame-by-frame basis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DeLucia, P. R. (1999). Size-arrival effects: The potential roles of conflicts between monocular and binocular time-to-contact information, and of computer aliasing. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(6), 1168–1177. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207621

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free