The future of bioethics: Three dogmas and a cup of hemlock

91Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper I argue that bioethics is in crisis and that it will not have a future unless it begins to embrace a more Socratic approach to its leading assumptions. The absence of a critical and sceptical spirit has resulted in little more than a dominant ideology. I focus on three key issues. First, that too often bioethics collapses into medical ethics. Second, that medical ethics itself is beset by a lack of self-reflection that I characterize here as a commitment to three dogmas. Third, I offer a more positive perspective by suggesting how bioethics may benefit from looking towards public health ethics as a new source of inspiration and direction. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dawson, A. (2010). The future of bioethics: Three dogmas and a cup of hemlock. Bioethics, 24(5), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01814.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free