In this paper I argue that bioethics is in crisis and that it will not have a future unless it begins to embrace a more Socratic approach to its leading assumptions. The absence of a critical and sceptical spirit has resulted in little more than a dominant ideology. I focus on three key issues. First, that too often bioethics collapses into medical ethics. Second, that medical ethics itself is beset by a lack of self-reflection that I characterize here as a commitment to three dogmas. Third, I offer a more positive perspective by suggesting how bioethics may benefit from looking towards public health ethics as a new source of inspiration and direction. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
CITATION STYLE
Dawson, A. (2010). The future of bioethics: Three dogmas and a cup of hemlock. Bioethics, 24(5), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01814.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.