Appraising evidence

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Appraisal of the quality of evidence when performing an umbrella review remains an integral part of the process. However, specifi c recommendations for evaluating systematic review quality have not conveniently coalesced for those interested in performing umbrella reviews. In this chapter, we will coalesce and discuss the tools available to critically appraise systematic reviews when performing an umbrella review. While assessing individual study risk of bias is not a standard part of an umbrella review, understanding the tools used by the included systematic reviews for this step is important. Guidelines exist for reporting systematic reviews of both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Methods for assessing quality of a systematic review and the strength of the evidence are well established. The expanding fi eld of network meta-analysis has also provided good practices to appraise reporting and quality of its reviews. Future guidance documents on performance of umbrella reviews should give careful consideration to providing recommendations for formal risk of bias assessment as part of the evidence appraisal process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baker, W. L., Bennetts, M., Coleman, C. I., & Cappelleri, J. C. (2016). Appraising evidence. In Umbrella Reviews: Evidence Synthesis with Overviews of Reviews and Meta-Epidemiologic Studies (pp. 115–135). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free