Reproducibility of sensitivity to capsaicin assessed by single breath inhalation methodology

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The hallmark of sensory hyperreactivity is an enhanced capsaicin induced cough reflex. The cough reflex can be modified by activation of nociceptive (capsaicin-sensitive) nerve terminals. The aim of our study was to assess the influence of exposure to CO2 concentrations up to 2.0 vol% on capsaicin induced cough reflex on four different occasions. Sixteen healthy volunteers were exposed to CO2 concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 vol% for 4 h and to clean air in a repeated measures cross-over design. After exposure the capsaicin induced cough reflex was assessed by the single breath dose-response method according to ERS 2007 guidelines. After blank solutions, capsaicin doses (n=12, range 0.49 to 1000 μM) were administrated from a nebulizer combined with a provocation system (Masterscope, software APS version 5.02). Doses were doubled every minute and the concentration causing five or more coughs (C5) was fixed as the end point. The inter-individual C5 capsaicin responsiveness reflected a representative range (0.95-1000 μM). On an intra-individual basis, a good reproducibility could be demonstrated for four tests within 3 weeks. There was no influence of CO2 challenge on the cough reflex. The first capsaicin test demonstrated a lower C5 threshold independent of the CO2 concentration applied. In conclusion, assessing the capsaicin cough reflex by single breath inhalation is reliable. However, the at cough sensitivity might be overestimated at the first test occasion. Exposure to CO2 in concentrations of up to 2.0 vol% has no effect on sensory reactivity. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoffmeyer, F., Sucker, K., Rosenkranz, N., Berresheim, H., Monse, C., Brüning, T., & Bünger, J. (2013). Reproducibility of sensitivity to capsaicin assessed by single breath inhalation methodology. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Vol. 755, pp. 71–78). Springer Science and Business Media, LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4546-9_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free