Universal adhesives and dual-cured core buildup composite material: Adhesive properties

6Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dual-cured buildup composites and simplified light-cured adhesive systems are mixed with a chemical activator to prevent the incompatibility between them. Objective: To evaluate microshear bond strength (μSBS) and nanoleakage (NL) of three universal adhesives used under buildup composites using different curing modes, at baseline and after 6-months (6m). Methodology: Dentin specimens of 55 molars were assigned to: Clearfil Universal Bond[CFU], Prime&Bond Elect[PBE] and One Coat 7 Universal[OCU]. All-Bond Universal[ABU] and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose[SMP] were used as controls. CFU, PBE, and OCU were: Light-cured [LC], dual-cured using a self-curing activator [DC], and self-cured, using a self-curing activator and waiting for 20 min [SC]. Upon the application of the adhesive, transparent matrices were filled with a dual-cured buildup composite and light cured, then tested in mSBS. For NL, the specimens were submersed in ammoniacal silver nitrate and sectioned to observe under the SEM. Three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test were applied (α=0.05). Results: OCU/LC-PBE/LC resulted in higher mean μSBS than ABU/LC. For SMP/DC higher mean μSBS were obtained than for both CFU/DC and OCU/DC (baseline). No universal adhesive was significantly affected by curing mode or storage time. CFU, PBE, and OCU did not undergo significant changes in any curing mode (p>0.05). NL (baseline) PBE/LC resulted in higher %NL compared to ABU/LC. SMP/DC resulted in higher %NL than CFU/DC-OCU/DC. CFU/LC/DC resulted in lower %NL than CFU/SC. PBE/SC resulted in lower %NL than PBE/DC. OCU/LC/SC showed lower %NL than OCU/DC. OCU showed significant lower %NL than CFU and PBE. All CFU groups, as well as OCU/SC, resulted in increased %NL at 6m when compared with baseline. Conclusion: For universal adhesives used in etch-and-rinse mode, self-cured activator and different curing modes did not influence μSBS. However, some interactions were observed for NL, but this influence was material-specific.

References Powered by Scopus

Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives

1080Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: A systematic review

536Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes

513Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Is clinical behavior of composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions influenced by the application mode of universal adhesives? A systematic review and meta-analysis

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Classification and Selection of Adhesive Agents; an Overview for the General Dentist

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Which self-etch acidic composition may result in higher dental bonds at the long-term? A network meta-analysis review of in vitro studies

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malaquias, P., Gutiérrez, M. F., Sutil, E., De Matos, T. P., Hanzen, T. A., Reis, A., … Loguercio, A. D. (2020). Universal adhesives and dual-cured core buildup composite material: Adhesive properties. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 28, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0121

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

59%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

74%

Social Sciences 3

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free