The aim of this chapter is to answer the following question: ‘How and why were models, mechanisms, analogies, metaphors and assumptions that could be characterized as Lamarckian-Spencerian, neo-Lamarckian perceived to be especially congenial to an emerging sociology seeking to become a scientific discipline in the latter part of the nineteenth century, and even in the early twentieth century?’ In answering this question, I shall briefly address the following issues: determinism and plasticity, individuals and collectivities, heredity and inheritance, and deal primarily with Herbert Spencer and Émile Durkheim. This essay is dedicated to the memory of Silvan S. Schweber.
CITATION STYLE
Gissis, S. B. (2017). Models, metaphors, lamarckisms and the emergence of ‘scientific sociology.’ In The Palgrave Handbook of Biology and Society (pp. 25–47). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52879-7_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.