Generative AI and Teachers - For Us or Against Us? A Case Study

  • Pettersson J
  • Hult E
  • Eriksson T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present insightful results of a survey on the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) by university teachers in their teaching activities. The transformation of education by GenAI, particularly large language models (LLMs), has been presenting both opportunities and challenges, including cheating by students. We prepared the online survey according to best practices and the questions were created by the authors, who have pedagogy experience. The survey contained 12 questions and a pilot study was first conducted. The survey was then sent to all teachers in multiple departments across different campuses of the university of interest in Sweden: Luleå University of Technology. The survey was available in both Swedish and English. The results show that 35 teachers (more than half) use GenAI out of 67 respondents. Preparation is the teaching activity with the most frequency that GenAI is used for and ChatGPT is the most commonly used GenAI. 59% say it has impacted their teaching, however, 55% say there should be legislation around the use of GenAI, especially as inaccuracies and cheating are the biggest concerns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pettersson, J., Hult, E., Eriksson, T., & Adewumi, O. (2024). Generative AI and Teachers - For Us or Against Us? A Case Study. In 14th Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence SCAI 2024, June 10-11, 2024, Jönköping, Sweden (Vol. 208, pp. 37–43). Linköping University Electronic Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp208005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free